Report from Galapagos Exploratorium
about dispatches conference sessions photo tour links






   download Hotspot Map >
(JPEG file)





Dispatch #3 

< prev dispatch

next dispatch >

September 13, 2004

The name of this workshop is “El Niño Early Warning for Sustainable Development in Pacific Rim Countries and Islands.” As Mickey points out in the first formal day of the meeting, each word by itself could be the focus of an entire workshop. Indeed, in gatherings of this nature a lot of time is spent clarifying language, and science conferences can often get stuck on definitions. A good part of the first day is spent attempting to come to some agreement on several terms in the title, including sustainable development (more below), El Niño (is it warm water or the entire pattern of climate shifts caused by the changing water temperatures?); early (is two months enough advance warning? What about countries like Australia and India that get no warning?); and Pacific Rim (does it only include the countries on the edge of the Pacific, or can the term also include islands in the middle?). We also batted around other terms that are included in the meeting agenda such as knowledge, “hot spots,” and weak (as in, “There is currently a weak El Niño developing in the mid Pacific,” an announcement recently made by NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).


We’re now housed in a meeting room at the civic center after Jose Luis negotiated with the mayor of Puerto Ayota for the space. To help with the discussions, Mickey and his assistant DJan have prepared “view books,” which are essentially bound notebooks with discussion bullet points for each session and inspiring quotes and images throughout. It’s a handy place to jot notes and ideas and most of the participants do just that.


What Is Sustainable Development?

The discussions here are surprisingly philosophical for a science workshop, and often touch on the meaning of environmental justice, climate affairs, vulnerability, and resilience. Language is constantly evolving and words are produced by social negotiation. The fact that language can be ambiguous is both good and bad, says participant Dale Jamieson, a philosopher and environmental scientist at New York University. Good, because it gets people to the table to work things out together, and bad, because no one really knows what they’re talking about. In this meeting, it makes for some lively discussion and we end up discussing sustainable development for a good hour.


Sustainable development is a relatively new buzzword for balancing the needs of humankind against the needs of ecosystems, but its meaning shifts depending on where you put the emphasis. Those who are focused on economics like to put development first, but the sustainable folks would just as soon drop development altogether, and have started to refer to the concept as sustainability. Holger Meinke, who works with farmers in Australia, offers the term "triple bottom line," which refers to the negotiated trade off between economic, social, and environmental needs. The understanding is that sometimes policies benefit one of the factors more than the others.


What’s Hot and What’s Not?
Another loaded term is “hot spots,” which refers to areas in the world that are affected by El Niño’s shifting climate patterns. The map here shows some of the areas socked by El Niño, including Australia with droughts and Southern California with heavy winter rains. As several people point out, the problem with the map is that it’s too simplistic and cartoon-like. You’re either in or you’re out (“sorry India”), and there are no areas of gray.

The naming of a hot spot can also have political and economic repercussions. When the media first picked up on El Niño, the term was often associated with dramatic headlines about deluges and droughts. That means that when an El Niño is declared, some Pacific Islands could lose their valuable tourist trade for a season. In the workshop, there was some discussion of using other language to describe these climate anomalies, but Mickey wasn’t ready to give up on the term. He said “hot spots” was still better than “ENSO-specific geography.”



back to top ^

< prev dispatch

next dispatch >